[ ontology ]
Ana unearths the definitions, context, playbooks, and permissions buried across your systems, then assembles them into a self-maintaining semantic layer, fully reviewable and yours as a Git repo.




What an active customer is. How you measure revenue. Which system holds which fact, and who may see it. An ontology is your company's rules, written as code a machine can execute — and kept in a repository on your account. That makes it an asset you own rather than a platform you rent.
Today, you centralize onto a single data platform. Model the dataset. Build a semantic layer over the metrics. Wire it to your agent. Then run the whole line again for the next dataset, and the next.
7 WEEKS
DATASET 1
3 WEEKS 1.5 WEEKS 1.5 WEEKS 1 WEEK
7 WEEKS
DATASET 2
3 WEEKS 1.5 WEEKS 1.5 WEEKS 1 WEEK
7 WEEKS
DATASET 3
3 WEEKS 1.5 WEEKS 1.5 WEEKS 1 WEEK21 weeks, nothing reused.
Ana doesn't need you to begin with a migration or centralization effort. It starts across the systems you already run: cloud data platforms, on-prem systems, APIs, BI tools, operational applications.
It reads the schemas, relationships, queries, underlying data, and business logic spread across them, and reconciles all of it into a shared model of your business. Decades of institutional knowledge, captured without moving a single dataset.
Every question teaches Ana more about how your business actually uses its data: which definitions matter, how teams interpret them differently, where the context is still missing.
Ana turns what it learns into proposed patches to the ontology. Every patch is reviewable, version-controlled, and synced bi-directionally with Git.
Updates revenue to subtract returns. Three analyses this week ran into this gap, so making it explicit in the definition.
Everything in the ontology is a file in a tree — the metric definition, the methodology, the comp spreadsheet, the query itself. Files are what every agent already knows how to inspect, edit, diff, and test.
The query file is TQL: your SQL, with the meaning attached. The query stays the query you would have written; the file adds the documentation that explains it and the permissions that guard it. Definitions any agent can read are not lock-in.
Beyond semantic models and supporting context, the ontology stores everything built on top of them: playbooks, dashboards, data apps, agents — each a file beside the definitions and permissions it depends on, not state stranded in a tool that owns it.
So nothing stays in a silo. An agent inherits the metric a dashboard already proved; a data app inherits the permissions a playbook already established. Anything Ana builds comes from what came before it.
An ontology that only describes your business is a reference. Ana works from it through permissioned actions: writing to your data warehouse, collecting input and holding state in data apps, taking the steps a workflow needs by hitting your APIs. Those actions are defined in the ontology and live there, beside the definitions they depend on and the permissions that bound them.
So the model that decides what a number means is the model that decides what may be done about it. Nothing acts on a definition it isn't allowed to read.
The ontology is text under version control. Ana proposes, your team reviews, the change merges — and every merge syncs both ways with a Git remote on your own account. Everyone else's ontology lives inside their platform, readable only through them. Yours is plain files, readable by anything.
Watch supplier concentration nightly
The ontology isn't locked to Ana. Connect it to whatever you already run: your own harness, Claude, ChatGPT, or your own product surface.
Claude & ChatGPT
Ana
Any MCP client
Your own agents
When I walked out of the first meeting with TextQL, I thought, wow, this is a product that many of our portfolio companies could benefit from.
"With TextQL, our analysts can now focus on high leverage tasks and the most challenging problems."
"We looked at a number of different solutions. We found TextQL to be the best."